It appears that UBER may have disabled/overridden Volvo's built-in safety platform, "City Safety". City safety automatically brakes for obstructions, up to 50MPH.
Wow, I remember reading the App Developer AMA and assuming it was fact without checking any references myself. Beyond filter bubbles and fake news, this really shows how susceptible we are to our own bias.
Online, I could be completely cynical about everything, not believe anyone without 10 layers of solid citations, and so on. And to do that I'd have to spend 48 hours per day online checking facts and sources, or never venture onto the internet.
On the other end, I could just believe everyone at face value, and get bamboozled and misled frequently.
Instead, each person has to strike a balance. Have a balance of trust, and recognize when you're putting forth faith in someone. Be ready to transition from trust to cynicism. For things that don't matter (like "believing someone is a millionaire"), don't worry about it - unless and until that "millionaire" tries to offer you personally something too good to be true.
Exactly. I have nothing invested in the story some random guy on Reddit is telling. Why not take it at face value? If I'm going to go tell a bunch of friends about it or take some action myself based on it, then sure, I'm going to want to apply a little skepticism to save myself from making a mistake or looking foolish.
As a past customer, I would say they're somewhere in between; perhaps leaning towards software. The process is highly automated, with 90% of the transaction handled via the apps/web and most hand holding in the beginning and the end of the transaction. While you are assigned an "agent", you will also work with other random agents as you make requests and your requests are sent through some kind of queue workflow. Further, their staff is paid a salary, not commission as the traditional agent/broker. As a result, Redfin splits the traditional buyers commission with you and you may use those funds towards your closings, etc. I am a happy customer and would use them again.
Past customer as well. I found them to be exactly what I needed in the competitive market of LA. I was already doing most of the research and finding the listings I wanted anyway on the MLS. So why would I want to pay a commission to an agent that isn't doing much for me anyway.
Which is standard BS and I can't believe people continue to say this. Maybe the seller would have accepted less if they didn't have to pay 6% (which can be tens of thousands on the average deal these days). In the case of redfin the buyer does _ACTUALLY_ pay less for a house since your getting a rebate against the money your spending. Unless the seller is losing money on the deal, it is the buyer that is effectively ponying up the cash to pay everyone (in this case themselves).
I'm also a fairly happy ex-redfin customer, and I can't help but support them if for no other reason than a number of brokerages around me are now creating flat rate schedules to compete.
TLDR: my 2 cents - that 6% is ripe for disruption, so if Redfin have a differentiator maybe that price surge is justified.
For letting, my experience of comparing Hawaii with the UK is that one has to pay around 10% (plus misc charges) for decent quality full service let and management for 12 month contract in both markets.
On the other hand, Which Magazine [1] (a bit like Consumer Reports in the UK) has this to say on sales costs in the UK:
>Multi-agency agreement ... You'll pay a higher fee to go multi-agency - usually between 2% and 3.5%. Given that any estate agent worth their salt will list your property on portals like Rightmove, and being advertised several times in the same place can seem a little desperate, it's probably not worth paying the extra for this kind of contract.
>Sole agency agreement ... is the most common type of estate agent contract. This is the same as sole selling (see below) with the exception that, if you find a buyer yourself, you don’t have to pay the estate agent fees. The typical estate agent fee for sole agency is 1-2%.
That is, overall 1-3.5% for the seller. It's unusual for the buyer to have an agent in the UK.
In summary, letting costs are roughly the same in Hawaii and UK, but is way cheaper to sell in the UK than Hawaii.
Where I live some real estate companies charge a slightly lower (0.5% less iirc) fee in order to try to acquire more sellers. I would imagine this happens elsewhere, so I have to wonder - have there ever been any studies done to see if the agents fee actually has an effect on final price if it is higher or lower than the norm in an area?
I suspect the data already exists to analyze this and we could find out for certain if it is true or not. Part of me feels like it may, but then another part of me wonders if sellers will demand market prices regardless of what their agent cut is, and it isn't like the buyer cares where the money goes - $xxx for a house is the same cost whether the agent gets 3% or 1%
On the contrary, it's ALL paid by the buyer. Think about it, the buyer is the only one putting net cash into the equation. If the seller just takes the buyer's money to give to both of the real estate agents, it's still really just the buyer that is paying everyone.
I'm selling a house right now. We listed at 15% more than we wanted, factoring in the realtor fees and room to give the buyer some negotiation (not being in a super hot market). In both selling that house and buying the new one, almost all companies involved (appraisers, realtors, inspectors) were close to useless (with the exception of the title companies, who did the actual legal stuff off the transaction). There is massive room for disruption in the industry, but also massive inertia.
you get cash at closing from what the seller has paid your Redfin agent. This is either applied to your closing costs or given back to you as a check. So, the argument over who is paying is off topic when the fact is, if you buy with redfin, you'll likely save a couple thousand dollars.
Denver, CO | McGraw Hill Financial (Platts) | Full Time | ONSITE
Platts is a leading global provider of energy, petrochemicals, metals and agriculture information, and a premier source of benchmark price assessments for those commodity markets.
Be a key player on a small team of developers, able to share your experience and ideas. Join us in re-writing a core suite of applications using modern frameworks and tooling while supporting existing applications and business requests. Enjoy competitive pay, modern offices, ample benefits and opportunities throughout the business.
We are looking for 2 new team members:
* 1 Full Stack ASP.NET Web Application Developer that brings strong front-end experience including CSS pre-rocessing and MV* Javascript frameworks.
* 1 ASP.NET Web Application Developer that brings proven back-end experience in software patterns, web services, testing and lives by the SOLID development principles.
For more information and application submissions, please review the listing below:
