For what definition of dead?
Sure, not so many use it for new projects, but it is still being maintained. There is an upcoming major release which will output ES2015.
I've got some tens of libraries/apps written in CS, no plans to migrate them. Works as well today as it did 3 years ago.
> I've got some tens of libraries/apps written in CS, no plans to migrate them. Works as well today as it did 3 years ago.
You might have a different view to the above then. Sounds like you're using it for the kinds of things it's good for, perhaps. (Languages can fall into vogue and (infuriatingly) go viral for all the wrong reasons... with everyone fighting it and not understanding why)
Not sure I'm using it for anything special... But one reason I chose it is my preference for minimal syntax, which is not a fashion thing and has not changed since I did Python 8 years ago. It also fixes some bugs in JS, like defaulting to globals on omitted `var` or implicit conversions on `!=`.
I do wish to have gradual static typechecking available though. This may unfortunately force me over to TypeScript or ES2015+Flow.
Heh, that's kind of funny. If that's the main criteria for "death", then Coffeescript is in good company. Except for Visual Basic, which is basically a cockroach refusing to be killed by Microsoft, everything else is alive and vibrant.
Possibly horrible by geek purity standards, but waaaaaay more used than D :)
I think it says a lot that the only top 5 in the "Loved" tab that's also present on the whole "Wanted" tab is Swift. Not that I use Swift, but it's the one with a mainstream use case today pretty much.
It will be interesting to see how it looks in 5 years.
