Ah, my mistake. But perhaps you could consider 24/192 -> 16/48 a lossy codec in ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		trevyn on Aug 29, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: 24/192 Music Downloads Are Very Silly Indeed (2012... Ah, my mistake. But perhaps you could consider 24/192 -> 16/48 a lossy codec in this context; the same argument does apply, for the same reasons.

anyfoo on Aug 29, 2017 [–]

That way it does make sense, editing might require higher fidelity than we can perceive in the final project to avoid artifacts.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact