Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If jury duty is random why not political duty?

Jurors are asked to do a couple fairly common tasks that most people do frequently throughout their lives: (1) listen to different sides of a story and decide which side to believe, and (2) decide the motives for a person's acts.

A legislator is asked to judge complex policy questions often requiring extensive specialized knowledge. The arguments for and against are often long and complex. It's not a job you can expect to take some random adult off the street for and have them do it competently.



Why should a career in party politics improve your ability to make these decisions?

Do current law makers have to pass some kind of knowledge based test to be allowed to make the decisions?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: