Besides, actually making a struct everytime is not that bad in practice.
I also understand (and strongly support) the committee's desire not to introduce yet another language construct when a library solution can be worked out, given the horrible beast c++[11,14,17,20] has already become.
I also understand (and strongly support) the committee's desire not to introduce yet another language construct when a library solution can be worked out, given the horrible beast c++[11,14,17,20] has already become.