Or execs are driving a bus into the wall. It wouldn't be the first time that happened for sure.
> I'm also not aware of Chrome being less explodable.
It used to be. It only took them 10 years to enable sandboxing.
> with its malware-filled extension store
And no rational person installs extensions from it for that reason without first checking who stands behind the extension.
> then it has access to 1/4 of your tabs and therefore might potentially be able to steal sensitive data
So essentially not equivalent.
Or execs are driving a bus into the wall. It wouldn't be the first time that happened for sure.
> I'm also not aware of Chrome being less explodable.
It used to be. It only took them 10 years to enable sandboxing.
> with its malware-filled extension store
And no rational person installs extensions from it for that reason without first checking who stands behind the extension.
> then it has access to 1/4 of your tabs and therefore might potentially be able to steal sensitive data
So essentially not equivalent.