Thanks for the clarification. I'm still most interested in the results of the 'failures'. What did the people who failed to compete the MOOCs end up doing? How about those who succeeded with the mini live classes, but did not continue into your full program?
That is unfortunate, although I understand the practical reasons for why that is the case. However, how do we resolve the bias of only looking at the success stories? What if all of the 'failures' also went on to $90k average development jobs within the first month of quitting the MOOC? $90k developer jobs are not exactly difficult to come by in the current market to anyone who has expressed an interest in programming. The fact that they were willing to try a code bootcamp MOOC puts them miles ahead of the general population.
As I stated above, we've A/B tested it with random samples, but it's hard to get any data on "failure to complete" populations because of obvious sampling bias
