Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For all that cannot access both versions, keep in mind that the EU one is a vastly simpler UI, it almost looks like just a blog archive, while the US one is a more feature full typical newspaper homepage. Not saying that either one is better, just that it's not an apple to apple comparison.


> not an apple to apple comparison.

Hm, what if you’re a reader looking for journalistic text articles, is the same content available on both?


I'm not a regular USA today reader, but from a brief look it seems like in the EU version only the most recent ~30 articles are "reachable" by clicks from the home page.

p.s. the EU version is on it's own subdomain, maybe you can reach it from the US too: https://eu.usatoday.com/


Nope, it redirects back to the regular one for US users.


I’ve rarely seen a website load so fast on mobile...


Whilst all the articles seem to be accessible if you know the exact URL, the homepage only shows the latest stories and there are no links to different news categories.

Also, the articles seem to be missing links and the videos are not available.

If all you want is the text of the articles and you only want the latest stories, the EU experience is probably great. But if you want more, you're probably going to be disappointed.


I use uBlock to explicitly make some newspapers "article only", that is, remove all UI elements that are not the article. No ads, other article links, or navigation. Vastly improved reading experience.


Firefox has Reader Mode (little book icon to the right of the URL bar, appears on text-heavy sites) which should do this automatically.

I believe Safari has this, too. Might find an extension for other browsers.


This tweet shows the difference with screenshots:

https://twitter.com/alexhern/status/999998807856242688



Rather than linking to another insidious "social media platform," would it be possible to simply describe what is there?

Many of us have sworn off Twitter, FB, Google, youtube, etc. because we don't care for the tracking, nor do we care for regulations. Unfortunately, we miss out on many things when people insist we participate on those sites by merely linking to them as part of a discussion.


I get this argument when you're taking about a non-public Facebook post, but you don't need a Twitter account to view content posted on Twitter.


They're redirecting to https://text.npr.org/ (which already existed)


Not simple at all, as in both instances we are looking at multiple images that compare different version with various measurements attached.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: