the title of the article implies that there is new evidence for the existence of multiple dimensions, while the content of the article is about the opposite being the case
Hard to see how. "Dose of reality" usually means evidence to the contrary. Even if there was some ambiguity, the first line of the article as well as the caption of the opening image make it clear.
It's probably more cryptic than ambiguous, due to the decorative language. A lengthy terms and conditions is not ambiguous, yet it's very vexatious. This is neither ambiguous nor vexatious. Perhaps though, it's a little bit cryptic. A simple man must try a little harder. Spock would probably say the statement is intrinsically ambiguous due to the metaphor, however.
