Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Real, but much lower than coal. Coal causes on the order of 1000 times more deaths per kilowatt of power produced than nuclear power. This is counting nuclear disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. Even if our nuclear track record were much worse, nuclear power would still be safer than coal.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-d...



i think the major risk for nuclear energy isn't about human death but rather economical consequences of having an entire region destroyed for 40 thousands years.


This surprised me too, but apparently it's not as bad as that. Containment and cleanup is dangerous and expensive, but not impossible.

Chernobyl is maybe starting to be re-inhabited? http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Most_Chernobyl_towns_fi...

Here's ground zero at Hiroshima. Open 24/7, in the middle of the city. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Hiroshima+Atomic+Bomb+Hypo...

EDIT: And see the nearby Peace Memorial Park. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Hiroshima+Peace+Memorial+P...


Yep, I've been to Hiroshima myself and there was no concern about radiation at all... It's been washed away after 73 years

Of course, it's because both Hiroshima and Nagasaki got bit by first generation atomic bomb, and are right next to the sea. A salted nuclear explosion in a deep desert or inside a cave might make a seemingly-forever radioactive fallout. But that's not a concern in nuclear power I'd say.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: