No, they are equation that previously both items were socially acceptable until society demanded change and made both illegal and provided services to enforce such laws.

The impact of violating privacy is neither increased nor decreased by the impact of theft and/or murder. If we compare theft and murder, theft «in general» is less impactful than murder, as I'm deprived of property and potentially physically injured with theft, with murder I am deprived of life itself.

That murder is generally more impactful doesn't make theft more acceptable/less bad; we should have laws for both.

"Cookie banners" are a misnomer. GDPR rules apply to all persistent personal identifiers, not just cookies. (And likewise, they do not apply to cookies which are not personal identifiers or are critical for site functionality)