Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are making a lot of assumptions about what someone wants/intends when they contribute to open source codebases. If an author chooses, for example, the AGPL, I think they clearly had a different intention. Like it or not, not everyone wants to dedicate their work to the public domain.


Then why contribute to open source if you want to still be a gatekeeper? In that case better to fork it and work in a private repo.


GPL code is open source but what you do with it also needs to be open source as a condition of its use. Will CoPilot inform developers if suddenly the code suggested requires them to re-license their software?


Every large successful open source project I know is explicitly not in the public domain/licensed CC0. I understand that there are some people that are very against copyright/intellectual property but you surely must interact with a large number of projects/people that disagree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: