Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's how the game is played. First, you make ludicrous demands, then when you later change your demands to be merely ridiculous, your opponents think they've scored a win.


That's right - I remember when the DMCA got passed and there was just as much opposition. Now the DMCA is the new "sanity". Something tells me we're losing the war.

I find myself accepting that some of the things I would like to do are just going to have to be done underground.


The parts that are outrageous about the DMCA are still outrageous. Like that you can get in jail for "circumventing" DRM mechanisms. There just happens to be one part about it that works out great for websites with user generated content.


With the DMCA, the pro-copyright people have to play a game of whack a mole. It allows entire site like online manga readers to exist in the first place.


Better to play whack-a-mole than play Manhattan Project.

And nobody has to play whack-a-mole. iTunes is a perfect example of "getting with the times".


The only reason manga readers exist at all is because a reasonable alternative does not exist.

If you could download, legally, that sort of thing for a token fee, not like the $0.99 download that finally made online music scales work, the demand would drop quickly.

Why spend hours trying to torrent something when for a nominal fee you can get a legitimate copy in seconds?


Why spend hours trying to torrent something when for a nominal fee you can get a legitimate copy in seconds?

Actually, web manga readers are some of the most convenient way to read manga online.


I know things like that are mired in a mixture of indifferent publishers, Japan tending to be quite insular, and licensing restrictions.

It's not a technical problem you can solve with copyright enforcement. It's a supply problem caused by vendors not being in the right channels.

That there's a web reader that works should prove there's demand.


A new idea fills the window of what the public regards as unthinkable, causing the desired idea to shift into the window of what the public views as sensible, without its proponents necessarily having explained any benefits of the desired idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window


Yes, it's called the "Overton Window".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window


Then you just reinsert the provisions in another bill next year.

A "win" would be a law that materially increased internet freedom.


Correct: Maslow's Window

You get them to settle for something they would not have even considered if the first demands were not so ludicrous.

Effective Technique.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: