Perhaps the Tao of Pooh is better than the original Taoism, or is an improvement.
If you like TOP better, or think it's more correct, or more wise, that's fine.
(I don't think so, but someone else might.)
I also strongly disagree with some of the sibling comments which insist that Taoism does not have a non-mystical (i.e., non-religious) core. As a disclaimer, I'm not really an expert. But I can see that there is a wise and rational framework there, that does not depend on make believe.
If you like TOP better, or think it's more correct, or more wise, that's fine.
(I don't think so, but someone else might.)
I also strongly disagree with some of the sibling comments which insist that Taoism does not have a non-mystical (i.e., non-religious) core. As a disclaimer, I'm not really an expert. But I can see that there is a wise and rational framework there, that does not depend on make believe.