If you want to discredit theorists who have been critical of scientific practices, you need to put down the Sokal and actually engage with specific works.
NB: I'm completely ignorant in this realm.
I thought one of the key points of "Impostures Intellectuelles" was that it defined the group of criticized "postmodernists" and referenced specific essays and papers?
I've read at least an article that they wrote and all they did was take some quotes out of context and show how they were scientifically inaccurate when they seemed to me to be metaphorical from the start. I can't speak for the book, however.
NB: I'm completely ignorant in this realm.
I thought one of the key points of "Impostures Intellectuelles" was that it defined the group of criticized "postmodernists" and referenced specific essays and papers?