Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i have seen worse.

i.e. sites that show on page with the url http://www.example.com and another page with the URL http://www.example.com and even after another click the URL http://www.example.com with completely new content

and sites, that use a logic like this http://www.example.com/357893857435/sfjsfsfsfd/this-should-b... where http://www.example.com/357893857435/sfjsfsfsfd/this-is-shoul... and http://www.example.com/357893857435/sfjsfsfsfd/tHIS-is-the-s... show the same page, oh and of course http://www.example.com/357893857435/sfjsfsfsfd also shows the same page.

oh, and cases where http://www.example.com/click1/click2/click3/item-id/123 show the same page as http://www.example.com/click1/item-id/123 which show the same page as http://www.example.com/click1/click2/click3/click4/item-id/1...

all of the examples above are far worse than bvb.de



Quite frankly, I despise the use of "SEO URLs" altogether. It's basically a waste of bytes.


Sometimes, sometimes not. You can often compress a lot of

&parameter=value into a simple /value/

rewrite. This - by most accounts - makes it more SEO friendly. Granted, putting full sentences that match an article title is never necessary, but there are a lot of SEO tricks that can make a url not only "nicer" looking but also shorter.


Some of the best SEO URLs also tend to be human guessable URLs, which is definitely not a waste of bytes.


Not if you view SEO as genuinely helping search engines to find content in a way that improves the discoverability of web pages.

If it's purely to boost rankings artificially, then yes, I agree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: