Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What makes this bad? Or rather what makes this objectively bad? I feel like URL schemes espoused by people who judge them are basically bs. Success of the website IMO seems like the only objective measure and by that measure pretty much any URL scheme is fine given the schemes used on some of the most popular sites use schemes that people like jakub_g complain about

I can see where maybe an API URL might have objective better and worse schemes but a content URL? Show me the research results, not just fashion opinions



It's a legit point and a legit question. Instead of voting it down answer the question with some objective facts




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: