Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm pretty sure you're not making any claims in other jurisdictions implicitly — that would be somewhat terrifying.

Whether the clause is triggered or not shouldn't matter if the patents aren't valid in your jurisdiction.

You don't have to state your rights — you just have them (there might be exceptions to this).

---

I'd love to get an answer to the bigger question as well.



> (there might be exceptions to this)

Are there ever! For example, right against self-incrimination must now be invoked explicitly. Refusing to answer a question (they will say "being evasive") can be used against you unless you affirmatively state you are exercising your right to remain silent. [1]

[1] - http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/chemerinsky_silence_i...


Fortunately we germans don't have these kind of problems (yet.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: